<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Interesting article on historical fact and provenence</title>
		<link>http://wychwood.wikidot.com/forum/t-74070/interesting-article-on-historical-fact-and-provenence</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Interesting article on historical fact and provenence&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 04:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://wychwood.wikidot.com/forum/t-74070#post-219395</guid>
				<title>Interesting article on historical fact and provenence</title>
				<link>http://wychwood.wikidot.com/forum/t-74070/interesting-article-on-historical-fact-and-provenence#post-219395</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Ferny</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>24772</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>As everyone knows, I struggle with the concept of historical reconstructions of the past, because of lack of or incomplete evidence. I'm working on it. This is an interesting article on that type of thing, but the dude in question at least worked (normally) with current events.</p> <p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7501682.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7501682.stm</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>